|
The
government's domestic deficit in 1999 was
significantly lower than the estimates
during the year, estimates which
constituted a factor in determining the
target deficit in 2000. The government's
total deficit also deviated from the
target set in the budget - 2 percent of
GDP - by a quarter of a percent of GDP,
and was 0.15 percent of GDP lower than the
1998 deficit, as a result of the
improvement in the domestic deficit and
the increase in the surplus with abroad.
Estimates of actual performance, based as
they are on a cash basis and not on an
accrual basis, which would be more
appropriate from an economic aspect, do
not include deferred wage payments arising
from agreements already signed, or
payments for defense imports planned for
1999 but received in 2000. Both income and
expenses were lower than the budget
forecast. Domestic income was some 3.6
percent below the budgeted amount, and
only about one-fifth of the deviation can
be attributed to lower-than-forecast
economic growth. Domestic expenses were
some 2 percent less than the budgeted
figure, due among other things to the fact
that teachers' and doctors' wage
agreements had not been finalized, and to
slower than expected price rises.
Estimates of the Central Bureau of
Statistics (accrual basis) indicate that
public consumption, seasonally adjusted,
rose by 4.2 percent in real terms in the
second half of the year; most of the
increase occurred in the last quarter and
was the result of a rise in defense
imports. Total transfer payments (based on
data up to September) rose in real terms
by 2.5 percent in the period reviewed
compared with the second half of 1998; in
1999:III the rise was 1.2 percent,
compared with steep increases in 1998:III
and 1997:III. All the major categories of
social allowances showed a slower rise,
and in the category of work accidents and
victims of hostilities there was a 9
percent decline, and in unemployment a 3
percent decline, annual rates. The
estimate of the Accountant-General, mainly
based on cash basis data, shows that the
government's domestic deficit was low in
every month from July to November, and
jumped in December; in the whole of the
second half of the year it amounted to
about 4 percent of GDP. The domestic
deficit, including the deficits of the
government, the Bank of Israel, and the
Jewish Agency, totaled 4.2 percent of GDP
in the period reviewed, down from 5.3
percent of GDP in the second half of 1998;
the decline was due to a rise in
government income and a fall in its
expenses. The greater part of the deficit
was financed by borrowing from the public
- mainly via deposits and the sale of
bonds (there was no income from
privatization in this period) - and by a
low level of public-sector injection.
According to data from the State Revenue
Administration (accrual basis), total
government tax receipts in the period
reviewed were 6.8 percent higher than in
the equivalent period in 1998, after
rising by only 2 percent in the first half
of the year. Receipts in all tax
categories rose in real terms in the first
half of the year, based on original data
without seasonal adjustment, and rose even
faster in the second.
This
supports the assessment that there was a
recovery in the level of activity in the
second half: domestic gross VAT receipts
were 6 percent above their level in the
second half of 1998, civilian import taxes
rose by 13 percent, and transfer payments
from the public doubled in real terms. On
the other hand, transfer payments to
households, up to October, rose by a real
4 percent, faster than the real rise in
wages. Unemployment benefits were
unchanged in real terms, despite the
increase in the number of unemployed
persons; this is apparently due to the
stricter application of eligibility
criteria defined in the Social Security
Law, although the increase in the number
of those seeking employment for more than
27 weeks must have contributed to a rise
in the number of recipients of income
support payments. The Economic
Arrangements Law (legislation
supplementary to the Budget Law) passed at
the end of 1999, tightened up the criteria
for receipt of unemployment benefit
according to age and family situation,
shortened the period of eligibility, and
lowered the level of unemployment benefit
for those unemployed repeatedly.

|