|
REAL
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
: The Malaysian economy remained resilient in 2001 in the face
of a very challenging and uncertain external environment. While
the world economic slowdown was more severe than expected and
the unprecedented September 11 events in the United States had
widespread implications for all economies, Malaysia was able to
steer away from a major economic contraction and GDP growth for
the year remained in positive territory.
However,
given the openness of its economy with trade accounting for
about 200 percent of gross domestic products (GDP), Malaysia
was not spared from the negative effects of the United States
economic slowdown and global electronics downturn, These were
manifested in declining manufacturing production and negative
export growth, particularly of electronics. Nevertheless,
concerted efforts initiated by the government since the 1997/98
Asian financial crises to stimulate economic growth through
accelerating domestic economic activities and reducing the
over-dependence on exports helped the nation to sustain a
positive real GDP growth, albeit at a modest rate of 0.4
percent in 2001 (2000: 8.3 percent). This growth was achieved
within an environment of low inflationary pressures and full
employment.
The
fiscal stimulus measures and an accommodative monetary policy,
coupled with the on-going financial and corporate sector
restructuring initiatives, enabled the economy to weather the
more challenging external environment. In particular, the
increase in public sector expenditure with the introduction of
two pre-emptive fiscal packages, amounting to about US$1.9
billion and targeted at encouraging domestic demand spending,
helped to cushion the adverse impact of the weak external
sector. Public investment expenditure maintained its
double-digit growth of 15.5 percent (2000:19.9 percent), induced by the expansionary budget and augmented
further by the need to improve efficiency of project implementation.
Likewise, public consumption spending increased strongly by 11.9
percent (2000: 1.7 percent), due mainly to the procurement of office
supplies related to e-government flagship applications, payments for professional services and bonus payments for the
year. The direct contribution of the public sector was
significant, contributing 3.8 percentage points to real GDP
growth in 2001 and compensating for the negative 3.4 percentage
points from other sectors, particularly the private sector.
Private investment expenditure declined sharply by 19.7 percent
(2000: +28.7 percent), reflecting the negative impact of lower
external demand and excess capacity in certain sectors of the
economy, particularly in the export-oriented manufacturing
industries. Private consumption has, on the other hand,
remained resilient despite lower export earnings following the
positive impact of the fiscal stimulus measures. Supported by
the government’s measures to increase household disposable
income through the reduction in employees’ contribution to
the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), provision of higher tax
rebates to individual taxpayers and relaxation of Government
employees’ eligibility for car loans, together with a low
interest rates environment, private consumption continued to
increase further, by 2.8 percent during the year (2000: 12.2
percent).
On
the supply side, most of the major sectors were adversely affected by
the greater-than-expected slowdown in the world economy and
contraction of global demand for electronic products and components.
The manufacturing sector in particular, which had achieved
double-digit growth over the last twenty-one consecutive months since
May 1999, experienced a sharp deterioration in output growth,
especially in the export-oriented industries. However, the weaker
growth in the export-oriented manufacturing industries was partly
mitigated by a more resilient performance of the domestic-oriented
manufacturing industries that benefited from the expansionary fiscal
policy of the public sector. As such, the decline in the manufacturing
value added was contained at a single-digit rate of 5.1 percent (2000:
+21 percent).
Other
major domestic sectors of the economy, especially the services sector
continued to expand strongly by 4.9 percent (2000: 4.8 percent) on
account of better performance of government services and other
services sub-sectors. The fiscal stimulus measures, privatization of
infrastructure projects and housing development within a low interest
rate environment contributed to a stronger growth of 2.3 percent
(2000: 1 percent) in the construction sector. Value-added in the
agriculture sector expanded at a higher rate of 2.5 percent (2000: 0.6
percent), largely on account of greater palm oil production. Overall,
the effectiveness of the policy measures introduced and Malaysia’s
diversified economic structure have moderated somewhat the impact of
the decline in output from export-oriented industries.
INFLATION
: Inflation remained low in 2001. The consumer price index (CPI)
moderated further to 1.4 percent because of the stability of the
exchange rate, the low rate of inflation abroad, lower prices for many
commodities, and excess capacity in several sectors of the economy.
The moderate appreciation of the ringgit against non-US dollar
currencies, as well as lower prices paid by the producer (PPI) which
fell by 5.0 percent in 2001 also contributed to lower inflation in
2001.
EMPLOYMENT
: In 2001, the impact of the slowdown in economic activity was also
felt by the labor market, particularly in terms of retrenched workers
in the manufacturing sector. However, given the flexibility accorded
by the labor market, alternative measures that were adopted by
employers (such as pay cuts and temporary layoffs) helped contain the
number of workers retrenched. During the year, the slower growth
environment resulted in both the total employment and labor force
expanding at more moderate rates of 2.6 percent to 9.5 million workers
and 3.2 percent to 9.9 million persons, respectively. The unemployment
rate edged upwards from 3.1 percent in 2000 to 3.7 percent in 2001.
However, in remained below the 4.0 percent deemed to be the full
employment level. A total of 38,116 workers were retrenched (2000:
25,236) with 75.6 percent from the manufacturing sector. The
electronics and electrical products sub-sector accounted for almost
half (45.7 percent) of the total number of workers retrenched. The
number of job vacancies increased more moderately, by 6.5 percent to
131,459 in 2001 (2000: 123,484).
EXTERNAL
TRADE ACCOUNTS : Malaysia’s external position remained
fundamentally strong despite the slowdown in the global economy. In
fact, the overall balance of payments position turned around and
recorded a surplus in 2001. The improvement was due partly to lower
outflows in the financial account. The surplus in the current account
remained large, though it narrowed slightly at US$7.2 billion or
equivalent to 8.9 percent of nominal gross national product (GNP)
(2000: US$8.4 billion or 10.2 percent of GNP). The sizeable surplus
reflected a moderate decline in the trade account and improvements in
the income and services accounts.
On
the trade account, the impact of the world economic slowdown and the
global electronics downturn on Malaysia’s external demand has been
significant as growth in gross exports, which remained positive since
1987, declined by 10.4 percent in 2001. Almost all categories of
exports were adversely affected, particularly electronics and
non-household electrical appliances as well the primary commodities as
crude oil and palm oil. Nevertheless, given the existing structure of
a high import content in exports, coupled with moderation in domestic
demand conditions, gross imports also declined by 9.9 percent. This
has helped to contain the decline in the trade surplus that remained
large at US$14.1 billion (2000: US$16.3 billion). The services
account, on the other hand, registered a significantly smaller deficit
of US$2.2 billion (2000: -US$3 billion), reflecting the marked
improvements in the travel account and the smaller amount of payments
related to export and import activities. With lower corporate earnings
arising from weaker exports during the year, the deficit in the income
account also improved to US$6.8 billion (2000: -US$7.5 billion) on
account of lower repatriation of profits and dividends. The financial
account of the balance of payments turned more favorable in 2001, with
lower net outflows of US$3.9 billion (2000: US$6.3 billion). This was
due mainly to lower short-term capital outflows and higher external
borrowings by the federal government and non-bank private sector.
With
the surplus in the current account more than sufficient to meet the
deficit in the financial account, the overall position of the balance
of payments recorded a surplus of US$964 million (2000: US$974
million). With this favorable development, Malaysia’s net
international reserves strengthened further to US$30.8 billion as at
end of 2001 (end 2000: US$29.9 billion). The reserves level is
adequate to finance 5.2 months of retained imports and cover 5.1 times
the short-term external debts. The strengthening of the reserve
position is reflected by build-up in foreign exchange holdings from
trade and long-term capital inflows.
GROSS
EXTERNAL DEBT : Malaysia’s total external debt increased by 7.6
percent to RM169.8 billion (US$44.7 billion) in 2001. The increase is
also reflected in the ratio of external debt to gross domestic product
(GDP), which has increased to 51 percent in 2001 from 46 percent in
2000 (1997: 61 percent). This was largely due to the increase in the
private sector’s short-term and the federal government debt.
The
private sector’s short-term external debt increased significantly by
33.7 percent to RM23.3 billion (US$6.1 billion), equivalent to 13.7
percent of total external debt and 19.9 percent of international
reserves. This was largely on account of the increase in short-term
borrowings by commercial banks mainly to provide for their trade
financing activities, revolving credits and inter-company loans.
Although
the federal government external debt increased significantly by 29.3
percent to RM 24.3 billion (US$6.4 billion), it accounted for only a
small share (14.3 percent) of total external debt. The increase was
largely due to additional borrowings to finance the deficit, arising
mainly from the implementation of fiscal stimulus measures. The
government has also tapped the international capital markets to
maintain a market presence as well as to take advantage of the
favourable market conditions.
EXCHANGE
RATE : The ringgit exchange rate remained pegged to the US dollar
at the rate of RM3.80 per US dollar in 2001--an arrangement that has
been effective since 2 September 1998. The ringgit appreciated against
all major currencies, including regional currencies in tandem with the
strong U.S dollar. In terms of its trade-weighted nominal effective
exchange rate, the ringgit appreciated 5.5 percent during the year, in
line with the appreciation of the US dollar. The pegged exchange rate
regime continues to be supported by the strong fundamentals of the
economy as reflected by the strong current account surplus, the low
rate of inflation and the high level of reserves.
FISCAL
POLICY : Prior to the financial crisis in 1997, the federal
government recorded five consecutive years (1993-97) of budgetary
surplus. From 1998 to 2001, the federal government budgetary position
incurred deficits, largely because of expansionary fiscal policy
designed to support economic growth and recovery. The focus of the
2002 budget is, therefore, to continue the recovery process to a level
consistent with Malaysia’s growth potential. The three main thrusts
of the 2002 budget as presented to parliament in October 2001 were
directed at strengthening Malaysia’s economic growth through
increasing domestic demand, enhancing the private sector’s
resilience and competitiveness, diversifying the sources of growth and
ensuring a more equitable distribution of wealth.
Although
fiscal policy has been expansionary since 1998, Malaysia still enjoys
fiscal flexibility, and the continued expansionary budget in 2002
would not create risks in the economy. This is because the federal
government debt is expected to be contained at a manageable and
sustainable level. Debt servicing of the federal government is also
low, with interest payments accounting for about 16 percent of
operating expenditure. The level of expenditure would be managed by
taking into consideration the need to stimulate economic activities,
maintain a surplus position in the current account, avoid excessive
reliance on external borrowings, and avoid crowding out the private
sector in terms of borrowings from the domestic financial system.
Expenditure
allocation would continue to focus on programmes and projects that
would have higher multiplier effects on domestic activity and raise
the long-term productivity of the economy. In addition, the annual
budget contained both tax and non-tax fiscal incentives focused on
expanding domestic demand while strengthening the nation’s
competitiveness and resilience. Apart from promoting new sources of
growth, allocation is also aimed at developing skilled manpower and
technological competence, and expediting the restructuring of the
financial and corporate sectors. Regarding tax policy, the government
continued with its tax reform programmes aimed at improving tax
buoyancy and tax collection. Emoluments constitute the largest
component of operating expenditure. As for development expenditure,
education, transport infrastructure and trade and industry are the
biggest components.
MONETARY
POLICY : Monetary policy in 2001 was directed at promoting
domestic activities to mitigate the effect of the global economic
slowdown. The absence of inflationary pressures enabled monetary
policy to remain accommodative, with interest rates remaining low and
stable. Nevertheless, in the wake of the September 11 incidents, the
central bank, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), reduced its intervention
rate by 50 basis points to 5.0 percent on 20 September, marking its
first cut in more than two years. The reduction was aimed at
countering the impact from the worsening external environment and
stimulating domestic consumer and business activities.
Money
supply continued to expand in 2001, albeit at a more moderate pace in
line with the weaker economic activities, with M1, M2 and M3
increasing by 3.2 percent, 2.2 percent and 2.8 percent, respectively.
However, despite the more challenging environment, lending by the
banking system continued to expand by higher loans extended to the
household sector, particularly for the purchase of residential
property and passenger cars.
MEDIUM-TERM
OUTLOOK : Given that the outlook for the global economy has
improved, supported particularly by positive developments in United
States and the expected pick-up in world trade in tandem with a
gradual upturn in the electronics sector, the Malaysian economy is
well placed to strengthen further in 2002. However, some downside
risks need to be addressed as the strength of global recovery is still
uncertain and external demand may not be as strong as it was during
the 1999-2000 period. The current economic upturn is taking place
amidst global excess capacity, particularly in the information and
communication technology sector. Malaysia, therefore, needs to ensure
that the economic recovery gathers momentum and that the downside
risks are minimized.
Toward
this end, the government will continue to institute appropriate fiscal
and monetary policies to support the recovery momentum. The measures
implemented in 2002 budget are expected to contribute to improving the
business environment through not only demand side measures, but also
supply side initiatives. In this regard, policies and strategies are
targeted to realize the full potential of the agricultural and
services sectors, including tourism and education, as well as to
promote domestic resource-based industries, including support
services-related activities. Efforts are also intensified on building
strong small- and medium-scale enterprises, developing effective human
resources and enhancing productivity and competitiveness. The
incentive structures that are provided for in the budget will remain
favorable to both foreign and domestic investors.
In
2002, the total external debt is expected to decrease by 1.1 percent
to RM167.9 billion (US$44.2 billion), equivalent to 47.9 percent of
GDP. Nevertheless, the federal government external debt is expected to
increase by 22.9 percent to RM29.9 billion (US$7.9 billion). However,
it will continue to account for a small share (18 percent) of the
total external debt. The increase is mainly due to higher borrowings
by the federal government to finance the envisaged fiscal deficit. The
external borrowings of Non-financial Public Enterprises (NFPEs) and
the private sector are expected to be relatively small in 2002. The
debt service ratio is expected to stabilize at 5.3 percent in 2002.
To
further ensure an accommodative environment that would generate
greater economic activities, the government’s financial policy in
2002 would be placed on meeting the objectives set out in the phase of
the Financial Sector Master Plan. This involves enhancing the capacity
of the banking groups by benchmarking, upgrading skills, strengthening
corporate governance, encouraging new delivery channels and promoting
greater operational flexibility so as to become more efficient and
effective. In addition, the roles of the development financial
institutions would be intensified further to complement the activities
of the banking system, with the enforcement of the Development
Financial Act Institutions Act 2002. This is also in the light of
government’s efforts to expedite corporate restructuring and to
intensify private sector involvement as well as to broaden the
economic base in order to reduce vulnerability and to insulate the
economy from external risks.
With
strong macro-economic fundamentals already in place and early economic
indicators already showing positive signs in consumption, production
and investment as well as in anticipation of the gradual improvement
of the global economy and trade, the recovery of the Malaysian economy
will be modest, with real GDP expanding by 3.5 percent in 2002 (2000:
0.4 percent). All major sectors are expected to record positive
growth, with manufacturing as the lead sector, gaining from the
improvement in global demand for electronics. The services and
construction sectors, on the other hand, are envisaged to continue to
support domestic economy activity, benefiting from the impact of the
pro-growth policies already in place. As growth gathers momentum, the
private sector is expected to play greater role as the engine of the
economy, with the public sector providing the necessary support.
Domestic expenditure, both consumption and investment, is expected to
improve further by 2.8 percent (2001: 2.3 percent), contributing
positively by as much as 3.5 percentage points to GDP growth in 2002
(2001: 2.3 percentage point).
The
current account of the balance of payments is expected to continue to
register a small surplus position. The sharper trade surplus from
higher exports is likely to be eroded somewhat by higher imports.
Similarly, the services and income account deficit are expected to
widen. The current account surplus, however, is forecast to remain
large in 2002 at 7.9 percent of GNP (2001:8.9 percent).
The
expected pace of economic recovery and sustainable domestic spending
are very encouraging in the light of moderate inflationary pressures
and improvements in the labor market. For the whole of 2002, inflation
is expected to remain subdued although the increase in transportation
costs and retail prices of several petroleum products, as well as the
higher sales tax on cigarette and tobacco products announced during
the 2002 budget, has had some effect pushing up the CPI slightly. This
trend continued into the first three months of 2002, although CPI rose
only 1.4 percent during the period. The increase in the prices of
tobacco, transport and communication, and gross rent and fuels was
partly offset by a decline in the prices of clothing and footwear.
Continued excess capacity in some sectors and capacity-expansion
programmes being undertaken in other sectors, as well as lower
inflation abroad, are expected to mitigate any build-up of
inflationary
pressures.
The
labor market situation is expected to improve gradually in 2002 in
tandem with the recovery in the export sector. The unemployment rate
is forecast to decline to 3.6 percent in 2002 (2001: 3.7 percent). The
establishment of nine schemes for skill training and higher education,
with an allocation of RM300 million, is envisaged to contribute
positively to the development of skills of unemployed graduates and
retrenched workers. While IT-related areas are expected to create new
employment opportunities, the manufacturing sector will still be a
major source of new employment opportunities.
Annex
I
MALAYSIA:
OVERALL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
|
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
|
GDP
and Major Components (percent change, year over year, except
for noted)
|
|
Nominal
GDP (level in billion US$)
|
88.7
|
100.9
|
100.2
|
72.5
|
79
|
89.7
|
87.5
|
|
Real
GDP
|
9.8
|
10.0
|
7.3
|
-7.4
|
6.1
|
8.3
|
0.4
|
|
Consumption
|
10.5
|
5.6
|
4.6
|
-10
|
6.3
|
9.9
|
4.7
|
|
Private
Consumption
|
11.7
|
6.8
|
4.3
|
-10.2
|
3.3
|
12.2
|
2.8
|
|
Government
Consumption
|
6.1
|
0.7
|
5.7
|
-8.9
|
18.5
|
1.7
|
11.9
|
|
Investment
|
22.8
|
8.2
|
9.2
|
-43
|
-5.9
|
24.1
|
-2.1
|
|
Private
Investment
|
28.1
|
11.3
|
9.4
|
-55.2
|
-21.8
|
28.7
|
-19.7
|
|
Government
Investment
|
11.3
|
0.5
|
8.4
|
-8.4
|
15.9
|
19.9
|
15.5
|
|
Export
of Goods and Services
|
19.0
|
9.2
|
5.5
|
0.5
|
13.4
|
16.1
|
-7.6
|
|
Import
of Goods and Services
|
23.7
|
4.9
|
5.8
|
-18.8
|
10.8
|
24.2
|
-8.6
|
|
Fiscal
and External Balances (percent of GDP)
|
|
Budget
Balance
|
0.8
|
0.7
|
2.4
|
-1.8
|
-3.2
|
-5.8
|
5.5
|
|
Merchandise
Trade Balance
|
0.04
|
4.0
|
3.7
|
24.4
|
28.7
|
23.3
|
21.0
|
|
Current
Account Balance
|
-9.7
|
-4.4
|
-5.9
|
13.2
|
16
|
9.4
|
8.3
|
|
Financial
Account Balance
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
-8.4
|
-7.0
|
-4.5
|
|
Economic
Indicators (percent change, year over year, except as noted)
|
|
GDP
Deflator
|
3.6
|
3.7
|
3.5
|
8.5
|
0.0
|
4.7
|
-2.7
|
|
CPI
|
3.4
|
3.5
|
2.7
|
5.3
|
2.8
|
1.6
|
1.4
|
|
M2
|
24.0
|
19.8
|
22.7
|
1.5
|
13.7
|
5.2
|
2.1
|
|
Three-Month
Interbank Rate (percent p.a., end-period)
|
6.76
|
7.39
|
8.7
|
6.46
|
3.18
|
3.25
|
3.27
|
|
Real
Effective Exchange Rate (level, 1997=100)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unemployment
Rate (percent)
|
3.1
|
2.5
|
2.4
|
3.2
|
3.4
|
3.1
|
3.7
|
|
Population
(millions)
|
20.8
|
21.3
|
21.8
|
22.1
|
22.7
|
23.3
|
23.8
|
Annex
II
MALAYSIA:
FORECAST SUMMARY (percent change from previous year)
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
Official
|
IMF
|
LINK
|
ADB
|
OECD
|
Official
|
IMF
|
LINK
|
ADB
|
OECD
|
|
Real
GDP
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
5.0
|
0.4
|
4.6
|
3.5
|
3.0
|
6.2
|
4.2
|
6.0
|
|
Exports
|
-10.4
|
N.A.
|
7.2
|
-8.8#
|
N.A
|
4.4
|
N.A
|
8.9
|
7.0#
|
N.A
|
|
Imports
|
-9.9
|
N.A.
|
7.2
|
-7.6#
|
N.A
|
4.8
|
N.A
|
9.2
|
10.0#
|
N.A
|
|
CPI
|
1.4
|
1.4
|
2.1*
|
1.4
|
N.A
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
2.0*
|
2.3
|
N.A
|
|