|
In
the early 1990s, irrigation from the Indus River
and its tributaries constituted the world's
largest contiguous irrigation system, capable of
watering over 16 million hectares. The system
includes three major storage reservoirs and
numerous barrages, headworks, canals, and
distribution channels. The total length of the
canal system exceeds 58,000 kilometers; there
are an additional 1.6 million kilometers of farm
and field ditches.
Partition
placed portions of the Indus River and its
tributaries under India's control, leading to
prolonged disputes between India and Pakistan
over the use of Indus waters. After nine years
of negotiations and technical studies, the issue
was resolved by the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960.
After a ten-year transitional period, the treaty
awarded India use of the waters of the main
eastern tributaries in its territory--the Ravi,
Beas, and Sutlej rivers. Pakistan received use
of the waters of the Indus River and its western
tributaries, the Jhelum and Chenab rivers.
After
the treaty was signed, Pakistan began an
extensive and rapid irrigation construction
program, partly financed by the Indus Basin
Development Fund of US$800 million contributed
by various nations, including the United States,
and administered by the World Bank. Several
immense link canals were built to transfer water
from western rivers to eastern Punjab to replace
flows in eastern tributaries that India began to
divert in accordance with the terms of the
treaty. The Mangla Dam, on the Jhelum River, was
completed in 1967. The dam provided the first
significant water storage for the Indus
irrigation system. The dam also contributes to
flood control, to regulation of flows for some
of the link canals, and to the country's energy
supply. At the same time, additional
construction was undertaken on barrages and
canals.
A
second phase of irrigation expansion began in
1968, when a US$1.2 billion fund, also
administered by the World Bank, was established.
The key to this phase was the Tarbela Dam on the
Indus River, which is the world's largest
earth-filled dam. The dam, completed in the
1970s, reduced the destruction of periodic
floods and in 1994 was a major hydroelectric
generating source. Most important for
agriculture, the dam increases water
availability, particularly during low water,
which usually comes at critical growing periods.
Despite
massive expansion in the irrigation system, many
problems remain. The Indus irrigation system was
designed to fit the availability of water in the
rivers, to supply the largest area with minimum
water needs, and to achieve these objectives at
low operating costs with limited technical
staff. This system design has resulted in low
yields and low cropping intensity in the Indus
River plain, averaging about one crop a year,
whereas the climate and soils could reasonably
permit an average of almost 1.5 crops a year if
a more sophisticated irrigation network were in
place. The urgent need in the 1960s and 1970s to
increase crop production for domestic and export
markets led to water flows well above designed
capacities. Completion of the Mangla and Tarbela
reservoirs, as well as improvements in other
parts of the system, made larger water flows
possible. In addition, the government began
installing public tube wells that usually
discharge into upper levels of the system to add
to the available water. The higher water flows
in parts of the system considerably exceed
design capacities, creating stresses and risks
of breaches. Nonetheless, many farmers,
particularly those with smallholdings and those
toward the end of watercourses, suffer because
the supply of water is unreliable.
The
irrigation system represents a significant engineering
achievement and provides water to the fields that account for 90
percent of agricultural production. Nonetheless, serious
problems in the design of the irrigation system prevent
achieving the highest potential agricultural output.
Water
management is based largely on objectives and operational
procedures dating back many decades and is often inflexible and
unresponsive to current needs for greater water use efficiency
and high crop yields. Charges for water use do not meet
operational and maintenance costs, even though rates more than
doubled in the 1970s and were again increased in the 1980s.
Partly because of its low cost, water is often wasted by
farmers.
Good
water management is not practiced by government officials, who
often assume that investments in physical aspects of the system
will automatically yield higher crop production. Government
management of the system does not extend beyond the main
distribution channels. After passing through these channels,
water is directed onto the fields of individual farmers whose
water rights are based on long-established social and legal
codes. Groups of farmers voluntarily manage the watercourses
between main distribution channels and their fields. In effect,
the efficiency and effectiveness of water management relies on
the way farmers use the system.
The
exact amounts of water wasted have not been determined, but
studies suggest that losses are considerable and perhaps amount
to one-half of the water entering the system. Part of the waste
results from seepages in the delivery system. Even greater
amounts are probably lost because farmers use water whenever
their turn comes even if the water application is detrimental to
their crops. The attitude among almost all farmers is that they
should use water when available because it may not be available
at the next scheduled turn. Moreover, farmers have little
understanding of the most productive applications of water
during crop-growing cycles because of the lack of research and
extension services. As a result, improvements in the irrigation
system have not raised yields and output as expected. Some
experts believe that drastic changes are needed in government
policies and the legal and institutional framework of water
management if water use is to improve and that effective changes
can result in very large gains in agricultural output.

|